CHARACTERIZATION OF THE MAIN STRUCTURAL MANIFESTATIONS OF PERSONALITY HARDINESS IN THE CONDITIONS OF WAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2312-8437.51.2023-1.6Keywords:
hardiness, personality, control, internal locus of control, involvement, emotional selfregulation, developmentAbstract
The article is devoted to the study of the peculiarities of the manifestation of personality hardiness, its main structural components in the conditions of war. The main aspects of the manifestation of hardiness at the psychophysiological, socio-psychological and personal-semantic levels are determined. It is noted that it is an important mechanism for overcoming age and existential crises, a leading factor in the formation of motivation, retention of positive thinking and favorable attitudes. The article empirically confirms a strong, direct correlation between control and hardiness, which indicates that a developed internal locus of control of an individual provides a favorable level of proactive involvement, enthusiasm, enables a person to constructively perceive any experience, both positive and negative, find meaning in it, and effectively overcome the internal barrier, fear of mistakes and failures, which in turn forms a readiness for challenge, further development and achievement. The article also emphasizes the positive value of engagement in a person’s life, which contributes to an increase in the level of satisfaction, optimizes the possibility of self-realization, increases productivity and efficiency, has a positive effect on the emotional sphere of a person, becomes a source of motivation, and at the same time provides an opportunity to experience relaxation. It has been found that involvement and control are the leading mechanism of intrinsic motivation of the individual, which reinforce each other in the process of life. The obtained results of the study can be useful for practical application in the education system, psychological practice, in particular for personal development and prevention of destructive phenomena.
References
Гільман А.Ю. Проблема саногенного мислення в зарубіжній науці. Вісник Харківського національного університету ім. В. Н. Каразіна. Серія «Писхологія». Харків. 2015. Вип. 57. С. 64–68.
Титаренко Т.М., Ларіна Т.О. (2008) Життєстійкість особистості: соціальна необхідність та безпека. 104 с. URL: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiTt6zBv7f1AhWNgv0HHe5TBIYQFnoECAYQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Flib.iitta.gov.ua%2F9065%2F1%2FZhiznestoykost_lichnosti.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3hNhtvhXAw2mZPzN3FslPC.
Чиксентмігаї М. Потік. Психологія оптимального досвіду. Харків, 2017. 368 с.
Maddi S. Hardiness: An operationalization of existential courage. Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 2004. Apr. 4. P. 279–298.