Peer-review process

The article submitted to “Native word in ethnocultural dimension” is subject to peer review by two independent reviewers who pay attention to:

article design (the presence of relevant structural elements, correctness of References arrangement, correspondence with technical requirements);

article quality (citations of leading scientists in the area under study, sufficiency of source base, justification of theoretical provisions with factual evidence).

Two favorable reviews are the grounds for publishing the article. If one or two reviews are negative, the decision of the article’s rejection or publication is made by a majority of votes at a meeting of the editors.

In the presence of disagreements (conflict of interests), the decision to reject or publish the article is also made by a majority of votes at a meeting of the editors.

Criteria for rejecting the article:

1) the article does not meet the journal’s scope;

2) the article does not meet the declared requirements;

3) the article does not cover the research goal.