INFLUENCE OF THE GROUND ENVIRONMENT ON THE DIAGNOSTIC WILD PLANT SPECIES DIVERSITY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2450-8640.2022.1.9

Keywords:

soil, indicator plants, soil cover, physical and chemical properties

Abstract

The role of soil cover in the biosphere and human economic activity is wellknown, but an established and substantiated assessment of its qualitative state becomes important. Preliminary soil diagnostics and establishment of its physical and chemical properties are carried out using vegetation cover, in particular, diagnostic plant species as indicators of the studied components of the environment state. The nature of the soil, its structure, density, oxygen content, salts, nutrients, and habitat can be determined using plant indicators. The species diversity of wild diagnostic plants in the trial areas of Drohobych was determined. Equisetum arvense L., Hepatica nobilis, Ranunculus repens, Plantago major L., Urtica dioica, and Arctium lappa were among the most common diagnostic species. It was found that the diagnostic plant species growing in the trial areas corresponded to those ecological groups, which vital functions correlate with certain soil environmental factors. Their dominance is related to the chemical composition of the soil. Diagnostic species can serve as indicators for the conditions of humidification, acidity, salinity, and excess salt content, as well as the nitrogen, calcium, magnesium, potassium, and other nutrients available in the soil. As a result of the studies, it was found that, in general, the soils of the sample areas are acidic and slightly acidic (pH from 5.1 to 6.4), weakly and medium humus (2.6–3.7% of humus), with a relatively average content of gross nitrogen (0.12–0.27%) and phosphorus (0.05–0.14%), relatively poor on K2O and P2O5 in the upper horizon. In general, vegetation in the trial plots was heterogeneous in terms of floristic features, and biological and cenotic properties. Some species of plants were at different stages of their development. Indicator plants should be used to estimate both the soil cover state and the general state of the environment.

References

Balashov L.S. Plants-indicators of excessive new flooding. Ukrainian Botanical Journal. 1989. 26. No. 6. P. 70–75.

Baliuk S.A, Kucher A.V. Spatial features of soil cover as a basis for sustainable development. Ukrainian Geographical Journal. 2019. No. 3. P. 3–14.

Sampling and soil samples preparation for agrochemical analysis: Methods of sampling and samples preparation for chemical, bacteriological, and helminthological analysis: DSTU17.4.4.02-84. Moscow : Standartinform, 2008. 8 p.

Hlukhov O.Z., Prokhorova S.I. Indication of the state of the technogenic environment by the morphological variability of plants. Industrial botany. 2008. Issue 8. P. 3–9.

Honcharenko I.V. Phytoindication of anthropogenic load: monograph. Dnipro: Seredniak T.K., 2017. 127 p.

Hryhorchuk I.D. Use of plant bioindicators to estimate the soil toxicity in the territory of Kamianets-Podilskyi. Biological systems. Vol. 8 Iss. 2. 2016. P. 212–217.

Yeterevska L.V., Khrystynko A.O., Momot H.F., Kimova R.V. Evaluation of phosphate and potassium states of the whole, arable, and recultivated soils. Bulletin of Agricultural Science. 2019. Iss. No.5 (794). P. 62–68.

Ivaniuk T.M. Physical and chemical parameters of fresh sougrudes of the Polissia of Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of NFU of Ukraine. 2013. Iss. 23.4. P. 40-44.

Krasnov V.P., Orlov O.O., Vedmid M.M. Atlas of plants-indicators and types of forest conditions of the Ukrainian Polissya Monograph. Novograd-Volynskyi, 2009. 488 p.

Moroz A.O. Physical and chemical methods of soil analysis. Student Bulletin of the NUVGP. Iss. 2(4). 2015. P. 54-57.

Pankiv Z.P. Problems of the genesis of sod-podzolic surface-glazed soils of Precarpathia. Visnyk of Lviv University. Geographical series. Issue 29. 2003. P. 210–213.

Pankiv Z.P., Malyk S.Z., Yamelynets T.S. Diagnostic criteria for elementary soil-forming processes in profile-differentiated soils of Precarpathia. Agrochemistry and Soil Science. Iss. 89. Kharkiv: National Research Center "IGA named after O.N. Sokolovsky". 2020. P. 34–40.

Popovych V.V. Study of the physical and chemical properties of soils and burnt rocks on the territories of the Novovolynskyi Mining and Industrial District. Scientific Bulletin of NFU of Ukraine. 2008. Iss. 18.12. P. 258–264.

Yaroshko M. Acidity of soils and its effect on plant nutrition. Agronomist. 2013. No. 1. P. 30-33.

Тao Y.e., Wu G.-L., Zhang Y.-M. Dune-scale distribution pattern of herbaceous plants and their relationship with environmental factors in a saline–alkali desert in Central Asia. Sci Total Environ. 2017. Р. 473–480.

Cannon H.L. The use of plant indicators in ground water surveys, geologic mapping, and mineral prospecting. Taxon. 1971. Vol. 20(2-3) Р.227–256.

Khan S.M., et al. Phyto-climatic gradient of vegetation and habitat specificity in the high elevation Western Himalayas. Pak J Bot. 2013. Vol. 45. P. 223–230.

Rasheed S., Khan S.M., Ahmad Z., Mustafa G., Haq Z.U., Shah H., et al. Ecological assessment and indicator species analyses of the Cholistan desert using multivariate statistical tools. Pak J Bot/ 2022. Vol. 54. P.28-30.

Hussain M., Khan S.M., Abd_Allah E.F., Ul Haq Z., Alshahrani T.S., Alqarawi A.A., et al. Assessment of Plant communities and identification of indicator species of an ecotnal forest zone at durand line, district Kurram, Pakistan. Appl Ecol Environ Res. 2019. Vol.17(3). P. 6375–6396.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-22

Issue

Section

Статті